Uncategorized
GAO Reports on New Joint Trauma System
A US Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that DoD’s plans for a new Joint Trauma Care System do not fully incorporate leading practices. You can read an article that summarizes things here:
DoD’s New Trauma Care System Plans Do Not Fully Implement Leading Practices
You can read the GAO reports here:
Message from Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs
(I was at the MHS Senior Leader Symposium last week, so I can answer any questions people have in the comments section of this post.)
MHS Team:
With six months to go until October 1, 2018-our long-anticipated target of
NDAA 2017 Section 702 implementation-I wanted to share with you a few key
updates and reflections as we move towards this significant transition for
the Military Health System.
First, thank you to the more than 100 leaders that convened last week from
across the DHA, Services, and MTFs for the MHS Senior Leader Symposium
focused on developing performance plans to operationalize, target, and
tailor our efforts throughout the MHS transition process. Thank you for
sharing your perspectives, expertise, and insights as we work together to
build out our plans for October 1 and beyond. Your feedback will help
inform our efforts as we move forward to implement the Department’s
construct to carry out the reforms required by NDAA FY17 Section 702.
I emphasized to that group that MHS leadership remains laser-focused on
achieving an even more integrated, higher-performing MHS that meets the
intent laid out in the NDAA and continues years of Department progress in
strengthening the MHS’s ability to deliver high-quality care and support our
readiness mission. This requires a collective effort to reduce stovepipes
and enhance standardization across the MHS and to increase our effectiveness
by eliminating unnecessary duplication. The more we can reduce the costs of
running the system, the more we can invest to improve readiness and patient
care.
We’ve made great strides these past few months in operationalizing the MHS
transition, but much work remains. As we move forward, I’d like to reaffirm
three key takeaways from this past week to the MHS team.
First, the MHS transition process and change we’ve set out to do are hard.
But this change is also necessary. Since my first day at the Department of
Defense, I have been deeply impressed by the culture of adaptability and
resilience-the United States military lives, breaths, and succeeds by its
ability to accept change, take on a challenge, and accomplish results. While
the MHS embarks on some of the most sweeping changes in 30 years, I am
confident that you will adapt, lead, and successfully execute the next
chapter in our story.
Second, I understand how critical communications will be these next six
months, and I am committed to sharing updates on decisions and plans
regarding the MHS transition as they become available. Communications will
be key to ensuring every level of the MHS understands what changes are
taking place, how they impact the way we do business, and enable feedback
loops to confirm continuity of high-quality care to our patients. My ask to
you is to communicate these messages to your audiences, be they providers,
leaders on installations, or patients.
And third, now through October 1 and beyond, I’d like us all to uphold a few
key priorities that will guide our collective approach. We must never lose
sight of our core mission, which is to support the warfighter and care for
the patient. We must leverage the 702 transition to build and strengthen a
truly integrated and even more effective health care system. And lastly, we
must commit to integration and coordination of our readiness and health care
delivery missions.
Thank you for making the MHS a leader in health care and for working every
day to keep improving what we do and how we do it. And thank you for your
patience and perseverance in the months ahead to make this transition
successful. I look forward to working with this talented MHS team to make
these changes real and in doing so, improving the support and health care to
our 9.4 million Service members, retirees, and families who rely on your
efforts every single day.
Tom McCaffery
Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs
Navy Times Article – Lawmakers Criticize Navy’s Plan to Retire One of Two Hospital Ships
The Navy has been talking about this for years. Here’s an article from Navy Times about recent discussions:
Lawmakers Criticize Navy’s Plan to Retire One of Two Hospital Ships
Director of Professional Education at NMCP – O5/O6
Director, Professional Education (DPE) is responsible for oversight of:
- Graduate Medical and Dental Education (GMDE)
- Clinical Investigation Department (CID)
- Staff Education and Training (SEAT)
- Visual Information Department
- Healthcare Simulation & Bioskills Training Center
- Nursing Research
- Health Sciences Library.
The position is open to Navy Medical Corps officers at the O-5/O-6 level. Interested candidates should submit (preferably via e-mail) a letter of interest, a short bio, copies of their 3 most recent FITREPs, a CV (templates here) and Specialty Leader concurrence no later than 21 March 2018 to: CAPT Will Beckman, MC USN (contact info is in the global address book).
DoD Physician Shortage May Cause Lapse in Patient Access to Care
This is certainly an interesting article to read:
DoD Physician Shortage May Cause Lapse in Patient Access to Care
Here’s the page with the full GAO report available:
MILITARY PERSONNEL: Additional Actions Needed to Address Gaps in Military Physician Specialties
Here’s the one page PDF summary:
What is DOPMA and Why Should You Care?
DOPMA stands for Defense Officer Personnel Management Act. It has been the guideline for officer personnel management since December 1980. It was designed to help modernize management practices and correct problems with officer management that emerged in the post-World War II era. Its notable achievements include:
- Creating uniform promotion rates.
- Standardizing career lengths across the services.
- Regulating the number of senior officers as a proportion of the force.
- Creating reasonable and predictable expectations regarding when an officer would be eligible for promotion.
DOPMA has been criticized for creating a system with high turnover rates, frequent moves, and shorter military careers. It is often referred to as “up or out” and is the reason why LCDRs can only stay 20 years, CDRs 28 years, and CAPTs for 30 years.
In addition, the Medical and Dental Corps are “DOPMA exempt” when it comes to our promotion zones. This is why it is easy to predict when Medical Corps officers are going to be in zone. Our promotion zones are not reliant on how many senior physicians left the service.
The Nurse and Medical Service Corps are not DOPMA exempt. Their promotion zones vary from year to year depending on how many senior nurses or MSCs get out of the service.
For example, a Commander MSC friend of mine was stuck waiting for promotion to O6 until one of the CAPTs in his community retired. That would not happen to a physician or dentist because we are DOPMA exempt.
DOPMA has been under fire recently and is getting some attention toward revising it, which you can read about here:
The Defense Officer Personnel Management Act faces scrutiny in 2018
Up-or-out rules get new scrutiny from Congress
Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy
Here’s a PDF of the recently released strategic document:
Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy: Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge
2017 on MCCareer.org – A Review
Thanks to all of you who have made 2017 a successful year for MCCareer.org. Here is a recap of 2017:
- Total Website Views – 86,019 (up from 43,673 in 2016 and 10,870 in 2015)
- Total Visitors – 32,541 (up from 18,373 in 2016 and 3,705 in 2015)
- Posts Published – 185 (up from 133 in 2016 and 69 in 2015)
- Joel Schofer’s Promo Prep – 3,091 views (up from 2,100 views in 2016)
- Joel Schofer’s Fitrep Prep – 1,793 views (new in 2017)
- Total Income – Negative $99 (the cost of the site for the year, same as last year)
- Total Hours Spent On It – Hundreds! (same as last year)
Here are the top 10 posts/pages that weren’t the announcement of a promotion list (which are always very popular):
- Joel Schofer’s Promo Prep
- Useful Documents
- Joel Schofer’s Fitrep Prep
- LCDR Fitreps – Language for Writing Your Block 41
- Useful Links
- Personal Finance
- Consolidated Special Pays
- About Me (who knew I was so popular and interesting?)
- Career Consult & Record Review
- What are AQDs and How Do You Get Them?
Thanks for your support!
PoF Blog Post – Financial Implications of Leaving a Military Medicine Position
One of my readers pointed me to this blog post on Physician on Fire, which many of you will find interesting:
Financial Implications of Leaving a Military Medicine Position
If you’d like my own thoughts on the value of a military pension, you can read them here:
Consolidated Special Pay Profile – Residents
The new consolidated special pay plan is confusing. To try and alleviate that confusion, I’m going to publish what I’ll call special pay profiles. Next up…residents.
Monthly Pay of a Resident
Let’s assume this is a resident at NMC Portsmouth who had no prior service, did internship, a 2 year GMO tour, and now is a PGY-2 with dependents. This is what that resident should see on their LES:
BASE PAY - $4,950.90 (O3 over 3 pay grade from the 2017 Basic Pay Table)
BAS - $253.63 (all officers get the same rate)
BAH - $1872.00 (O3 with dependents rate in zip code 23708 based on this calculator)
SAVE PAY - $666.66 ($8K paid monthly, which is from Table 2 of the Final Navy FY17 Pay Plan)
TOTAL – $7743.19/month
ANNUAL TOTAL – $92,918.28