Uncategorized
2019 Navy Legislative Fellows Program Application Deadline Extended
WASHIGNTON (NNS) — The deadline for submitting applications for the 2019 Navy Legislative Fellows Program has been extended to April 13, 2018.
The Legislative Fellows Program allows naval officers, senior enlisted and Department of the Navy civilians to broaden their understanding of the legislative process and the operation of the U.S. Congress through a year-long full-time assignment to the office of a member of the House of Representatives or the Senate.
For more information, visit http://www.navy.mil/local/ola/legislative_fellowship1.asp.
FY19 Medical Corps Promotion Opportunity 85%
Here is the just released FY19 Active O5 Staff Corps Promotion Board Convening Order. The promotion opportunity was 85%, the highest in a long time:
| FY13 | FY14 | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | |
| CDR | 80% | 80% | 70% | 70% | 65% | 75% | 85% |
End-of-the-Month Personal Finance Summary
Here are all of my personal finance writings for the month of March. Enjoy!
Another Simple Way to Get Rich in the Military – Learn a Lucrative and Marketable Skill
Highlights from 2017 Physician Compensation Reports
How to Buy Life Insurance When You’re in the Military
Learn How to Retire Secure and Pay Taxes Once and Never Again – For Free!
Military Specific Impacts of Tax Reform
Saturday Critical Action – Buy a Used Car
Saturday Critical Action – Put Retirement First
Saturday Critical Action – Save Some for Your Future Self
Should You Invest in Real Estate?
Step 1 to Crush the Thrift Savings Plan – Prepare
Step 2 to Crush the Thrift Savings Plan – Decide
Step 3 to Crush the Thrift Savings Plan – Asset Allocation
Will the Government Get Rid of the “Free Lunch” of the TSP G Fund?
How to Encrypt E-mails to a Promotion Board
Many people who have tried to encrypt their e-mail message to the promotion boards have been frustrated when the encryption was denied by Outlook. Here is the process you need to follow to encrypt e-mails to the promotion board. I found it in the recently updated Officer Record Management document from PERS, which you can find here:
The email account CSCSELBOARD@navy.mil remains available to receive encrypted correspondence to selection boards. The sender must choose to encrypt the email. If the sender is unable to send encrypted email, any sensitive information or PII should be removed. To download the mailbox certificate for encrypted email, users must:
- Visit https://dod411.gds.disa.mil
- Type uasknpc@navy.mil or CSCSELBOARD@navy.mil in the “Email address” field, then click “Search”
- Click the “BUPERS” or “CSC” link under “Last Name”
- Click on the link “Download Certificate(s) as vCard”
- Click “Software Certificate for uasknpc@navy.mil” or “Software Certificate for CSCSELBOARD@navy.mil”
- Click the “Open” button on the File Download pop-up. The certificate will open. Click “Save and Close.”
- The certificate is then saved to the profile and can be used to send encrypted email.
GAO Reports on New Joint Trauma System
A US Government Accountability Office (GAO) report found that DoD’s plans for a new Joint Trauma Care System do not fully incorporate leading practices. You can read an article that summarizes things here:
DoD’s New Trauma Care System Plans Do Not Fully Implement Leading Practices
You can read the GAO reports here:
Message from Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs
(I was at the MHS Senior Leader Symposium last week, so I can answer any questions people have in the comments section of this post.)
MHS Team:
With six months to go until October 1, 2018-our long-anticipated target of
NDAA 2017 Section 702 implementation-I wanted to share with you a few key
updates and reflections as we move towards this significant transition for
the Military Health System.
First, thank you to the more than 100 leaders that convened last week from
across the DHA, Services, and MTFs for the MHS Senior Leader Symposium
focused on developing performance plans to operationalize, target, and
tailor our efforts throughout the MHS transition process. Thank you for
sharing your perspectives, expertise, and insights as we work together to
build out our plans for October 1 and beyond. Your feedback will help
inform our efforts as we move forward to implement the Department’s
construct to carry out the reforms required by NDAA FY17 Section 702.
I emphasized to that group that MHS leadership remains laser-focused on
achieving an even more integrated, higher-performing MHS that meets the
intent laid out in the NDAA and continues years of Department progress in
strengthening the MHS’s ability to deliver high-quality care and support our
readiness mission. This requires a collective effort to reduce stovepipes
and enhance standardization across the MHS and to increase our effectiveness
by eliminating unnecessary duplication. The more we can reduce the costs of
running the system, the more we can invest to improve readiness and patient
care.
We’ve made great strides these past few months in operationalizing the MHS
transition, but much work remains. As we move forward, I’d like to reaffirm
three key takeaways from this past week to the MHS team.
First, the MHS transition process and change we’ve set out to do are hard.
But this change is also necessary. Since my first day at the Department of
Defense, I have been deeply impressed by the culture of adaptability and
resilience-the United States military lives, breaths, and succeeds by its
ability to accept change, take on a challenge, and accomplish results. While
the MHS embarks on some of the most sweeping changes in 30 years, I am
confident that you will adapt, lead, and successfully execute the next
chapter in our story.
Second, I understand how critical communications will be these next six
months, and I am committed to sharing updates on decisions and plans
regarding the MHS transition as they become available. Communications will
be key to ensuring every level of the MHS understands what changes are
taking place, how they impact the way we do business, and enable feedback
loops to confirm continuity of high-quality care to our patients. My ask to
you is to communicate these messages to your audiences, be they providers,
leaders on installations, or patients.
And third, now through October 1 and beyond, I’d like us all to uphold a few
key priorities that will guide our collective approach. We must never lose
sight of our core mission, which is to support the warfighter and care for
the patient. We must leverage the 702 transition to build and strengthen a
truly integrated and even more effective health care system. And lastly, we
must commit to integration and coordination of our readiness and health care
delivery missions.
Thank you for making the MHS a leader in health care and for working every
day to keep improving what we do and how we do it. And thank you for your
patience and perseverance in the months ahead to make this transition
successful. I look forward to working with this talented MHS team to make
these changes real and in doing so, improving the support and health care to
our 9.4 million Service members, retirees, and families who rely on your
efforts every single day.
Tom McCaffery
Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs
Navy Times Article – Lawmakers Criticize Navy’s Plan to Retire One of Two Hospital Ships
The Navy has been talking about this for years. Here’s an article from Navy Times about recent discussions:
Lawmakers Criticize Navy’s Plan to Retire One of Two Hospital Ships
Director of Professional Education at NMCP – O5/O6
Director, Professional Education (DPE) is responsible for oversight of:
- Graduate Medical and Dental Education (GMDE)
- Clinical Investigation Department (CID)
- Staff Education and Training (SEAT)
- Visual Information Department
- Healthcare Simulation & Bioskills Training Center
- Nursing Research
- Health Sciences Library.
The position is open to Navy Medical Corps officers at the O-5/O-6 level. Interested candidates should submit (preferably via e-mail) a letter of interest, a short bio, copies of their 3 most recent FITREPs, a CV (templates here) and Specialty Leader concurrence no later than 21 March 2018 to: CAPT Will Beckman, MC USN (contact info is in the global address book).
DoD Physician Shortage May Cause Lapse in Patient Access to Care
This is certainly an interesting article to read:
DoD Physician Shortage May Cause Lapse in Patient Access to Care
Here’s the page with the full GAO report available:
MILITARY PERSONNEL: Additional Actions Needed to Address Gaps in Military Physician Specialties
Here’s the one page PDF summary:
What is DOPMA and Why Should You Care?
DOPMA stands for Defense Officer Personnel Management Act. It has been the guideline for officer personnel management since December 1980. It was designed to help modernize management practices and correct problems with officer management that emerged in the post-World War II era. Its notable achievements include:
- Creating uniform promotion rates.
- Standardizing career lengths across the services.
- Regulating the number of senior officers as a proportion of the force.
- Creating reasonable and predictable expectations regarding when an officer would be eligible for promotion.
DOPMA has been criticized for creating a system with high turnover rates, frequent moves, and shorter military careers. It is often referred to as “up or out” and is the reason why LCDRs can only stay 20 years, CDRs 28 years, and CAPTs for 30 years.
In addition, the Medical and Dental Corps are “DOPMA exempt” when it comes to our promotion zones. This is why it is easy to predict when Medical Corps officers are going to be in zone. Our promotion zones are not reliant on how many senior physicians left the service.
The Nurse and Medical Service Corps are not DOPMA exempt. Their promotion zones vary from year to year depending on how many senior nurses or MSCs get out of the service.
For example, a Commander MSC friend of mine was stuck waiting for promotion to O6 until one of the CAPTs in his community retired. That would not happen to a physician or dentist because we are DOPMA exempt.
DOPMA has been under fire recently and is getting some attention toward revising it, which you can read about here:
The Defense Officer Personnel Management Act faces scrutiny in 2018
Up-or-out rules get new scrutiny from Congress