promotion boards
Throwback Thursday Classic Post – Is Commander the New Terminal Rank? (And Other O6 Promotion Board Takeaways)
(2019 Note – This is one of the most popular posts on the blog and helped put it on the map. Since the FY16 O6 promotion opportunity of 50% when it was published in 2015, we’ve seen an uptrend:
- FY17 – 70% promotion opportunity – 34% in zone selection rate
- FY18 – 80% – 37%
- FY19 – 90% – 41%
- FY20 – 81% – 51%
That said, much of what I said in 2015 is still very true. Enjoy!)
In case you haven’t figured it out yet, it is getting harder to promote to Captain. Here are the historical promotion opportunities for O6. You don’t have to be a mathematician to notice the trend:
| FY08 | FY09 | FY10 | FY11 | FY12 | FY13 | FY14 | FY15 | FY16 | |
| CAPT | 80% | 80% | 80% | 80% | 80% | 60% | 60% | 60% | 50% |
There are a lot of physicians who came into the Navy when it was relatively easy for a physician to promote to Captain. If you could fog a mirror, you could likely promote. Well…things seem to have changed.
This has frustrated some physicians who failed to promote and is likely to frustrate more in the future. Aside from getting frustrated, though, it would benefit all involved if they could learn from this trend and try to adjust while there is still time. Here are my O6 promotion board takeaways:
- It is now normal when you fail to select for Captain the first time. In the FY16 board only 39% of Commanders who were in zone were promoted, leaving 61%, a clear majority, who did not. Physicians should expect to fail to select or “get passed over” the first time they are up for O6. (Only FY20 got over 50%, and barely at 51%.)
- Commander is the new terminal rank for full-time clinicians, and there’s nothing wrong with that. If the thought of taking on a significant collateral duty makes you want to cringe because you want to remain a full-time clinician during your time as an O5, you have likely reached your terminal rank. Physicians get very frustrated when they fail to promote to O6, thinking that the Navy doesn’t value clinical productivity, and this is just not true. The Navy does value clinical productivity, it just doesn’t think that they need to be Captains! The Captain rank has moved from being a reward obtained by most physicians who hang around long enough to a reward for those with senior leadership potential.
- The overwhelming majority of Commanders who promote to O6 take on a significant collateral duty. Whether they were a department head at a large MTF, a specialty leader, a residency director, a director, president of ECOMS, or in a senior operational role, they all had to pay their dues in these roles in order to score the EPs on their fitreps that allowed them to promote. These roles almost always necessitate a reduction in clinical activity, which is why you are less likely to promote to O6 as a full-time clinician.
- Having only one competitive EP fitrep before the promotion board is often not enough. At some of the larger MTFs it can take quite a while to “break out” from the pack of Commanders and get an EP on your fitrep. If you are lucky enough to get an EP but you only slide one in before you are in zone, it may not be enough. As the competition heats up, it is the people with multiple competitive EPs that will be in the best position to promote.
- You need to demonstrate career diversity while not hurting your chances to promote. The best time to mix it up is right after you are selected for Commander. You are finally senior enough to get a decent position at an operational command, BUMED, PERS, or some other alternative command. If instead of mixing it up you stay where you are, you will be the new, small fish in the largest pond in the Navy, the Commander fitrep competitive group. No matter what you do you are probably going to get promotable fitreps for a few years. You might as well use those years to break things up, PCS (even locally to an operational command – I’m not saying you have to move), and demonstrate that you are willing to flex for the needs of the Navy. You may get 1/1 EP fitreps but while you are a junior commander this is unlikely to hurt you. Then once you are done with that tour, you can return to a larger competitive group and compete for one of the aforementioned jobs if you have making O6 on your radar.
FY20 Active Duty Staff Corps O5 Promotion List
UNCLASSIFIED//
ROUTINE
R 181355Z JUN 19
FM SECNAV WASHINGTON DC
TO ALNAV
INFO SECNAV WASHINGTON DC
CNO WASHINGTON DC
CMC WASHINGTON DC
BT
UNCLAS
ALNAV 050/19
MSGID/GENADMIN/SECNAV WASHINGTON DC/-/JUN//
SUBJ/FY-20 ACTIVE-DUTY NAVY COMMANDER STAFF CORPS SELECTIONS//
REF/A/DOC/SECNAV/11JAN19//
AMPN/REF A IS THE FY-20 ACTIVE-DUTY NAVY COMMANDER STAFF CORPS PROMOTION
SELECTION BOARD CONVENING ORDER.//
RMKS/1. I am pleased to announce the following Staff Corps Officers on the
Active-Duty list selected for promotion to the permanent grade of Commander.
2. This message is not authority to deliver appointments.
Authority to effect promotion will normally be issued by future NAVADMINs
requiring NAVPERS 1421/7 preparation and forwarding of document to PERS-806.
3. Frocking is not authorized for any officer listed below until specific
authorization is received per SECNAVINST 1420.2B.
4. For proper alphabetical order read from left to right on each line. The
numbers following each name to the right indicate the relative seniority
among selectees within each competitive category.
Note: An (*) by the name indicates the selectee was merit reordered to the
top of the promotion list in accordance with reference (a).
Members are directed to verify their select status via BUPERS Online.
Medical Corps
Ackerman Vincent L 0023 Adams Nehkonti 0089
Amann Christopher J 0035 Bandle Jesse 0088
Barker Matthew D 0009 Bear Jonathan Read 0043
Bedzis Stephanie Marie 0055 Belin Laurence Justin 0069
Berger Jonathan Henry 0115 Berjohn Catherine M 0106
Bidlack Matthew Scott 0112 Biewenga Eric Donald 0062
Bloir Michael James 0038 Boatwright Robert O 0058
Bower Richard John 0056 Buckalew Elizabeth A 0110
Burke Tshawnda Janell 0070 Burns Carrick T 0122
Cabrera Orlando G 0105 Call Robert C 0126
Campbell Wesley Ray 0050 Carness Jeffrey M 0130
Carter Rachel E 0049 Clark Justin S 0015
Cook Jeffrey T 0064 Cowley Sean Francis* 0005
Cuellar Adrian Manuel 0042 Cunningham Bridget K 0098
Davis Christopher M 0077 Day Justin Lee 0052
Dececchis Daniel P 0030 Donahue Kathleen Marie 0036
Doubrava Matthew R 0007 Driscoll Sean Michael 0087
Dubil Elizabeth Anne 0084 Dupree James Imani 0073
Elenbaum Stephanie L 0083 Ewing John Thomas 0123
Ferguson Candida Ann 0127 Flint James H 0080
Florescarrera Aidith 0121 Foster Daniel A 0017
Garry Conor B 0057 Gaudreau Philip A III 0085
Giberman Anthony Allen 0012 Gliniecki Ross Andrew 0039
Gnandt Ryan Joseph 0107 Goodrich Jennifer Lynn 0099
Goodrich Richard P Jr 0068 Grimm Alan R 0046
Harbuck Andrew W 0081 Hegarty James Loughlin 0104
Helman Christopher D 0066 Henderson Patrick M 0011
Hoagland Benjamin D 0028 Ikeda Daniel Satoshi 0078
Jakubek George Adam 0120 Kerr Jonathan S 0018
Kitchen Levi Kern 0025 Klimaski David John 0020
Klocek Patrick J 0125 Krause Brian R 0027
Kuersteiner Karl A 0034 Lacey Brent Wallace 0124
Lagoski Danielle M 0131 Lammers Arthur K 0097
Legendre Brian Wade 0010 Lennon Robert P 0133
Liebig Jonathan Tyler 0026 Logemann Nicholas F 0111
Lokey Bryce David 0044 Love Rozalyn Grace F 0128
Lowry Debra Magill 0032 Lutynski Matthew L 0117
Mangan Katharine I 0090 Marra Janelle Marie 0113
Matthess Jessica Anne 0086 Mattingly John C 0134
Mcdermott Andrew John* 0006 Mcdonald Christine E 0016
Mcintyre Peter Zachary 0108 Mclaughlin Andrew D 0095
Mcmahon Daniel Patrick 0100 Mercadoabadie Joselyn 0063
Monlux Daniel Joseph 0047 Monteil Danielle C 0072
Moore David Allen* 0002 Moore Jeffrey Lee Jr 0118
Nelson Nicholas Thomas 0014 Oconnell Tara Ann 0103
Odonnell Robert F 0076 Perry Christopher M 0051
Ponton Ryan Patrick 0092 Porensky Paul N 0024
Portier Ray 0033 Potocko Joshua R 0022
Quail Jacob Frank 0132 Ramsey Jeremy Kenneth 0067
Reese Jacalyn H 0059 Restrepo Ryan David 0079
Ries James Patrick 0116 Ruddick Benjamin F 0082
Rustico Stacy E 0094 Rutan Kathryn Lynn* 0001
Schmitz Bruno A 0019 Schollnberger Elle* 0004
Seago Meghan Eileen 0101 Shafer Eric C 0037
Shapiro Bennett Howard 0048 Singaraju Raj C 0054
Smith Dustin Kyle 0075 Snider Tracie C 0114
Souza Jason Manuel 0074 Sracic Michael K 0093
Susmarski Adam James 0129 Swartz Katherine L 0053
Swenson Aaron Welby 0013 Thomas Darren Drew 0029
Touchette David M 0060 Treadwell Robyn M* 0003
Ugochukwu Obinna N 0031 Vaught Eric Robert 0096
Weisbrod Allison B 0071 Welch Rebecca R 0008
Wendt Matthew C 0045 Williams Bradley J 0021
Wonglopez Jaime Albert 0040 Worley Christopher R 0119
Wrenn Katherine Anne 0102 Wu Chai Hui 0091
Zeman Joseph Edward Jr 0109 Zimmerman James L 0041
Dental Corps
Abakah Ricardo M 0009 Adamo Matthew James 0013
Andersen Michael Roy* 0002 Beck Samuel Stephen 0006
Calvo Angel J 0035 Cervenka Peter D 0015
Cuca Chad Eric 0033 Dean Jeffrey Keith 0037
Doll James Kristopher 0025 Eppel Carla Louise 0019
Eppel Todd Andrew 0018 Fuhrmann Daniel Jacob 0034
Grubbs Thomas David 0023 Hamlin Nicholas James 0036
Havard Drew Bourne 0029 Holmes Robert Gary 0005
Hoppe Andrew John 0038 Howard Eric Michael 0016
Johndreau Stephen W 0020 Juliamontanez Maria D 0004
Ligon Kathy Alicia 0027 Lores Gustavo Eugenio 0014
Mushet Broc Allan 0011 Palauhernandez Wilfred 0007
Rasmussen Allen Daniel 0024 Rau Clayton Thomas 0031
Reardon Joseph Neil 0010 Rusthoven David James 0030
Sellers Christopher G* 0003 Smith Michael Anthony 0021
Stoner Robert Douglas 0012 Valeri Arthur Stanley* 0001
Vick James Kyle 0008 Villarreal Eric Dean 0028
Werner Rachel Leigh 0022 Wray Barak Anthony 0026
Zheng Yu 0017
Medical Service Corps
Aldana Alexander 0049 Anderson Jacqueline R 0018
Auth Hak 0053 Behil Matthew Joseph 0007
Brenner Danyell Lynn 0019 Bullman Clinton Wade 0041
Bustamante Sara Marie 0010 Cardenal Raul Ernesto* 0005
Cascardo Neil Douglas 0021 Clifford Heath M* 0001
Dagher Kathleen Ruth 0056 Decker Suzanne Mara 0011
Deguzman Vince Edwards 0027 Delzer Jeffrey Alan* 0003
Domery Michael Edward 0036 Doolittle Corey Nathan 0032
Duff Jason Michael 0020 Ecklund Christofer J 0047
Gardner John J III* 0004 Gire Boyce Randall 0045
Grant Shannon Leigh 0013 Green Vena Christine 0054
Gribben David Brian 0008 Griswold Cheryl A* 0006
Jackson Gretchen S 0043 Jarmer Ryan F 0051
Jordan Byron L 0023 Kang Dean 0038
Lester Bradley Raymond 0035 Lingard Christopher P* 0002
Love Ramaud Deshaun 0026 Macdonald Ann Morgan 0052
Magel Larkin Elizabeth 0050 Mcettrick David M 0012
Mcguinness Ian T 0009 Medina Rudy Durana 0048
Monk Gregory James 0039 Morgan Dario P 0040
Mutuc Emerson Austria 0025 Nilsson Kirt C 0046
Osmond Joseph Egill 0055 Owston Christopher L 0034
Peters Jason Andrew 0031 Phillips Jodi Marie 0042
Pyle Bryan Lincoln 0017 Rabinowitz Yaron 0057
Sood Amit 0022 Stastny Joseph Glenn 0014
Sterns George Herbert 0016 Sutherland Ian W 0029
Tam Francis 0015 Tschauner Suzanne M 0044
Weber Shawn Andrew 0024 Welsh Timothy T 0030
Whitehead Richard A 0033 Wishmeyer Robert James 0037
Judge Advocate General's Corps
Boyle Timothy G 0014 Callan Katherine Ray 0015
Cornthwaite Joshua L 0019 Crabtree Robin Donnell 0007
Davis Bradley Luke 0017 Davis Bryan Michael 0018
Garcia Benjamin B 0020 Goodin John Russell* 0001
Griffo Joseph T* 0002 Haagensen Brian C II 0009
Leahy Andrea Jo 0022 Lindsey Mark A 0003
Mejeur Kevin James 0010 Mosley Mishonda M 0013
Murray Stephen Andrew 0012 Nakamura Byron M 0016
Napier Daniel William 0011 Nelson Eric Scott 0006
Orton Brandi Rae 0021 Snow Garrett Steven 0005
Worstell Katherine D 0008 Zimmerman Delicia G 0004
Nurse Corps
Alvarado Arturo Jr 0028 Barksdale Willie Ray 0027
Bouvier Amy Lyn 0020 Brand George J 0003
Bryant Crystal Anita 0004 Clark Amy Renner 0036
Crane Gabrielle Ann 0024 Cuevas Danielle Kay 0014
Davis Corey Leigh 0038 Edwardssmith Marie F 0029
Ellsworth Tatianna T 0012 Fisher Kim Sue 0026
Flinn Lorelie D 0022 Iannitto Ann Elizabeth 0018
Jones Frank Arthur 0034 Leoncio Abreail Dawn 0031
Maiatico Richard D 0021 Matella Thomas O Jr 0017
Morgan Meedeessa O 0019 Myer Heather J 0037
Nikolaus Aaron D 0015 Orgill Robert 0016
Radakovic Marko 0007 Ray Jeremy Michael 0025
Rebustillo Jonathan F 0030 Romano Gina Denise 0006
Ross Jeffrey Lind 0023 Salinas Dagoberto Jr* 0002
Saltzman Nick Anthony 0008 Solwazi Bettina Ann 0039
Soteras Catherine C 0009 Starnes Hannah C 0033
Sullivan Virginia C 0013 Thomas Devin Corina 0035
Venske Jeremy T 0032 Whiting Timothy G* 0001
Zaycek Amy Partridge 0010 Zuloaga Elizabeth M 0005
Supply Corps
Albert Kevin Lee 0019 Aldridge Austin G 0060
Berkau Matthew M* 0001 Blackburn Warren K 0053
Blevins Diana C 0024 Bono Michael James 0017
Brown Lamont Armond* 0009 Burt Christopher Scott 0049
Bustamante Bryan James 0020 Butler Curtiss 0059
Carideo Jeffrey W 0025 Casey Brendan Thomas 0037
Ceaser Curtis Paul 0057 Christensen Jon Karl* 0007
Christianson Britta W 0028 Chu Hyong Young 0040
Clute Matthew C 0041 Collazos Ricardo A 0010
Craig Marcus Marvin 0034 Cullinan Robert Ryan 0015
Cunningham Victor A* 0002 Custard Jennifer Lynn 0043
Deleon Jason Fortin 0058 Devorse Paul G 0027
Eddy Daniel Joseph 0032 Ekundayo Adesina 0035
Eubanks Lee H 0013 Ewing Danny Lee Jr 0054
Fischer Joshua Steven 0033 Gilmore Kenneth E III 0029
Koenig Noel Kathryn 0047 Krupa Konrad R 0039
Langford Kara Bowman 0050 Lieng Soktheas Scott* 0003
Maazouzi Anas El* 0006 Mccarthy Scott Matthew 0055
Melchert Joshua R* 0005 Miller Grant W 0026
Milliet Scott Robert 0052 Moody Sean Robert 0038
Nguyen Tony Nhat 0012 Osman Jamal Mohamed 0044
Paben Carrie Lynn 0061 Paul Robert W 0056
Rigoni Michael Paul 0045 Robinson Anthony 0018
Roth Geoffrey Franklin 0016 Salire Robert D 0014
Sargent Michael Paul* 0008 Schoenthal Erika M 0011
Schumann Jonathan D 0022 Stephens Wendell K 0042
Summers Brent Lawrence 0048 Taylor Jeremy B 0023
Teague Thomas Patrick 0036 Thomas Marcus E* 0004
Thompson Maura Lee 0030 Tobin Ryan Mcnair 0046
Wheeler Michael Robert 0031 Woodward Nathan T 0051
Young James H 0021
Chaplain Corps
Bareng Ryan B 0014 Bingol Thomas Albert 0009
Cloer Stephen Levi 0015 Coates Gregory Russell 0017
Curtis Daniel Lawrence 0008 Erwin Edward Hamilton 0010
Johnson Robert D 0007 Kleinman Aaron Elliot 0018
Lee Kyu Chang 0012 Martin Christopher S 0002
Myers James Walter Jr 0011 Park Philip Namkyu 0001
Prince Matthew Gene 0016 Rector Karen Jane 0006
Ross Jeffrey J 0013 Sikorski Leszek M 0005
Springer Timothy Allen 0004
Civil Engineer Corps
Allison Aaron Thomas 0013 Archer Christopher W* 0002
Brinkman Travis Duane* 0003 Chitty Patrick Coleman 0008
Dobling Michael L* 0001 Fredriksen Robert A 0015
Holland Stuart Alan 0007 Honek Amy Jean 0016
Johncock James David 0019 Kushner Adam George 0006
Maccumbee Cory David 0012 Mattivi Matthew Marino 0018
Mcilvaine Jacob Ross 0011 Mcmanus Michael John 0010
Mcmaster Danny Brian 0017 Moiles William Edward 0021
Nevin Jeremy Michael 0009 Newsom Donny Roy 0005
Nopkhun Shanewit 0004 Pergerson John Kyle 0020
Whitehouse Kristin B 0014
5. Released by the Honorable Richard V. Spencer, Secretary of the Navy.
BT
#0001
NNNN
UNCLASSIFIED//
FY20 Medical Corps O6 Statistics
Below are the statistics for the recently released Medical Corps O6 board. Remember that despite what you may think when you look at the stats, promotion boards do not favor one specialty over another:
FY20 Staff Corps O6 List is Out
Here it is. Congrats to all!
UNCLASSIFIED//
ROUTINE
R 301900Z APR 19
FM SECNAV WASHINGTON DC
TO ALNAV
INFO SECNAV WASHINGTON DC
CNO WASHINGTON DC
CMC WASHINGTON DC
BT
UNCLAS
ALNAV 034/19
MSGID/GENADMIN/SECNAV WASHINGTON DC/-/APR//
SUBJ/FY-20 ACTIVE-DUTY NAVY CAPTAIN STAFF CORPS SELECTIONS//
REF/A/DOC/SECNAV/11JAN19//
AMPN/REF A IS THE FY-20 ACTIVE-DUTY NAVY CAPTAIN STAFF PROMOTION SELECTION
BOARD CONVENING ORDER.//
RMKS/1. I am pleased to announce the following Staff Corps Officers on the
Active-Duty list for promotion to the permanent grade of Captain.
2. This message is not authority to deliver appointments.
Authority to effect promotion will normally be issued by future NAVADMINs
requiring NAVPERS 1421/7 preparation and forwarding of document to PERS-806.
3. Frocking is not authorized for any Officer listed below until specific
authorization is received per SECNAVINST 1420.2A.
4. For proper alphabetical order read from left to right on each line. The
numbers following each name to the right indicate the relative seniority
among selectees within each competitive category.
Note: An (*) by the name indicates the selectee was merit reordered to the
top of the promotion list in accordance with reference (a).
Members are directed to verify their select status via BUPERS Online.
Medical Corps
Acosta Ruben D 0075 Adriano Phillip M 0014
Afarin Afshin Khodaram 0046 Ahlgrim Joel Alan 0022
Arnold Michelle Gloria 0016 Austin Melissa C 0078
Bachmann Angela M 0047 Barrett Rhett A * 0010
Bayard Margaret Ann 0044 Becker Brent R 0059
Bennett William Ernest 0065 Borja Catherine A 0060
Broom Kimberly L 0062 Bryan Coleman J Jr 0042
Bryant Cynthia Maria 0033 Burman Natalie J 0030
Cazares Paulette R * 0011 Choe Chong H 0041
Christman Matthew S 0074 Chung Thomas L * 0003
Curry Jennifer A 0055 Dabelic Anja 0064
Dapena Juan Carlos 0017 Deussing Eric C 0051
Devan Michael L 0020 Duffy Erin Elizabeth 0036
Elmore Kelly Oberia * 0007 Elrod Marilisa G 0023
Foster Christin Michel 0021 Gauerke Steven J 0018
Gelfand Harold J 0038 Green Justin S 0034
Gutierrez Miguel A 0035 Hessert David D 0056
Hobbs Hasan A * 0004 Hodgson John Anthony 0054
Hogan Christopher J 0012 Jessie Elliot M 0050
Johnston Michael Gwynn 0070 Kaplan Michael Richard 0076
Keenan Bryan James 0077 Kyser Kathy Lynn * 0001
Lawrence Matthew W 0052 Linz Nelle A 0061
Martens Jeffrey S 0027 Mcdowell Michael P * 0002
Millegan Jeffrey H 0053 Montgomery Richard S 0032
Moree John 0015 Nederostek James C 0067
Needleman Matthew 0071 Norwood Brian Gilbert 0024
Oconnor Cormac J 0048 Palma James K 0019
Pluim Thomas A * 0009 Powell Obie M 0031
Propes Bryan D 0025 Rudinsky Sherri Lynn 0037
Smullen Rebecca M 0043 Sparks Scott A 0028
Staten Robert Allen 0040 Stoker Georgia A Gray 0039
Stokes Theophil A 0057 Tadlock Matthew D 0066
Tatro Christopher R 0029 Termini Michael S * 0005
Tripp Michael S 0063 Trueba Daniel J Jr 0045
Wallace Scott C 0072 Wallace William C 0002
Walrath Benjamin D * 0008 Warren Dirk A 0026
Waterman Bruce Allan 0073 Wessman Dylan E 0068
Zabrocki Luke A * 0006
Dental Corps
Bell David Lynn Jr 0011 Burke William J Jr 0018
Carroll Thomas Patrick 0002 Corbett James Thomas 0019
Ferreira Michael David 0005 Gillen Brian Michael 0004
Hanhila Christopher N 0013 Hinman Susan Elizabeth 0017
Kaplafka Christopher S 0006 Lien Khon Han 0015
Neal Jeffrey David 0007 Ragadio Jerome Nerez 0012
Smiley Cheri Renee 0014 Suffridge Calvin B 0008
Suris Jose Antonio 0009 Thompson Roger Scott 0001
Wonder Nathan John 0016 Zald Harold S 0003
Medical Service Corps
Aboona Ziad Tariq 0013 Barnes Eric Harold 0004
Bonvie Joseph Leonard 0017 Bristol Raymond M 0020
Burke David Michael 0009 Burke Gerald Francis 0008
Callahan John Horace 0011 Faber Bridgette M 0003
Fairchild Gregory Ross 0019 Freeman Dawn Marie 0026
Geislinger Leah Yoo 0027 Griesenbeck John * 0002
Hair Leslie Chris 0029 Hicks Danielle V 0016
Jenkins Joseph Sheldon 0030 Klinski Angelica A 0010
Logan Justin C 0023 Mcmullen Kellie L 0018
Melton John Lee 0014 Morrison Robert C 0024
Ojo Olaitan Fadeke 0015 Owens Edward Hollis 0022
Panke Randy Lee 0031 Riggs Leslie Edward Jr 0012
Rochino Duneley A 0006 Schwartz Benjamin J 0005
Teamer Hazelann K 0028 Tolentino Dennis C * 0001
Weiner Matthew Andrew 0021 White Lisa Allison 0025
Judge Advocate General's Corps
Ellis Brian John Jr 0009 Hutchinson Clifton II 0011
Jones Jason Lee 0003 Kline Robert Todd 0004
Montgomery John M 0007 Saybolt Gregory W 0006
Simodynes Hollis N 0005 Sklerov Matthew Jared 0010
Stancati Sarah A 0002 Transtrom Jeffrey G 0001
Wong Sylvaine W 0008
Nurse Corps
Blackman Virginia S 0003 Broom John Glen 0017
Buechel Jennifer J 0008 Burns Kevin James 0007
Daurora Daniel Andrew 0006 Flores Jose D 0010
Goforth Carl W 0009 Goggins Jamesetta W 0014
Higgins Stephanie M 0002 Jack Christopher M 0001
Ohliger Charlene R 0016 Phillips Mary E 0011
Ray Heather B 0015 Thomas Mark A 0012
Vega Kelly Elizabeth K 0013 Yablonsky Abigail M 0005
Supply Corps
Abuan Lillian Arrubio 0011 Almanza Cielo Isaac 0014
Ayers Aaron King 0016 Barich William James 0013
Bellott Timothy G 0004 Bolls Matthew L * 0001
Braendeholm Peter M 0024 Brickhaus Matthew J 0023
Carl Michael Shawn 0010 Clem Doyne D 0008
Corley Robert Michael 0020 Cramer Jayson Lee 0009
Edmonds Martin Leo 0012 Fahner Matthew Jon 0019
Hodge Tara Leigh 0025 House Kelly Wayne Jr 0022
Jenkins Thomas Richard 0026 Kovack Christopher T * 0002
Montinola John Gerard 0007 Norton Daniel Lee 0003
Pitel Joel Pantig 0006 Rogers Cameron William 0015
Sherman Paige Anne 0005 Tellis Charles Mccain 0021
Chaplain Corps
Hall Michael Eugene * 0001 Logan John Robert 0005
Mills Steven Douglas 0003 Sandford Bennett C 0002
Stennett Darren Lee 0004
Civil Engineer Corps
Butler William Roberts 0007 Jasinski Jeffrey David 0004
Jayne David Michael 0003 Kranz Jason Gregory 0002
Lebeau Warren Robert 0005 Leppard Benjamin David 0006
Meno Michael W Jr * 0001 Tobias Omarr Edward 0008
5. Released by the Honorable Richard V. Spencer, Secretary of the Navy.//
BT
#0001
NNNN
UNCLASSIFIED//
FY20 O5 Staff Corps Promotion Opportunities Released
The FY20 O5 Staff Corps Promotion Board Convening Order was released today. It contains a few interesting things that you should care about…
First, it contains language you should use to write your fitreps.
Second, it contains the promotion board opportunities on page 2, but you can see it here:
Promotion board math is explained in this post.
Third, it contains a discussion about the new merit reorder process, just like the O6 board. Here it is:
Merit Reorder During FY20 Promotion Boards
If you read page 16 of the FY20 Staff Corps O6 Promotion Board Convening Order, you’ll notice that there is a new section entitled “Recommendation for Reorder of Active-Duty Officers of Particular Merit.” This allows promotion boards to take up to 15% of the people they select and move them to the top of the promotion order if they feel they are worthy of it.
In other words, no longer will people promote based on seniority, but those who the board feels deserve it will move to the top of the list. It says:
Officers of particular merit are those officers whose records contain documented performance consistently superior to the performance of other officers recommended for promotion by this board.
That said, the promotion board could choose not to do this at all, leaving the people selected to promote based on their lineal number and seniority.
FY20 Staff Corps O6 Convening Order and Promotion Opportunities
The FY20 Staff Corps O6 Promotion Board Convening Order was released today. On page 2, you can see the following promotion opportunities:
- Medical Corps – 81%
- Dental Corps – 89%
- Medical Service Corps – 60%
- Nurse Corps – 50%
Promotion board math was reviewed last year and can be confusing, but what it means is this…
Pretend there were 100 physicians in zone for O6. The board could select 81 for O6, but that 81 comes from all of those eligible. In other words, anyone picked from below, in, or above zone counts toward the 81. This means your chances of being selected in zone are much less than the promotion opportunity of 81% because of all the above and below zone eligibles.
Just to give some Medical Corps perspective, here is the historical promotion opportunity as far back as I have it:
| FY13 | FY14 | FY15 | FY16 | FY17 | FY18 | FY19 | FY20 | |
| LCDR | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | |
| CDR | 80% | 80% | 70% | 70% | 65% | 75% | 85% | |
| CAPT | 60% | 60% | 60% | 50% | 70% | 80% | 90% | 81% |
How to Be Considered for Promotion if You’ve Been on Active Duty for Less Than 1 Year
The FY20 promotion board NAVADMIN was released in December. If you are in-zone or above-zone for an upcoming promotion board but you’ve been on active duty for less than 1 year, you should read #5 from the NAVADMIN, which says:
5. In-zone and above-zone eligible officers in the grades of lieutenant,
lieutenant commander and commander, whose placement on the Active -Duty List
is within one year of the convening dates of these boards, are automatically
deferred unless they specifically request to be considered. The officer may
waive this deferment and request consideration for promotion, in writing,
emailed to NPC_Officer_SELBD_Elig_Waivers.fct(AT)navy.mil or mailed
to:Commander, Navy Personnel Command (PERS-802)
5720 Integrity Drive
Millington, TN 38055-0000The request must be received by PERS-80 not later than 30 days prior to the
convening date of the board. All officers are reminded it is their
responsibility to ensure their personnel records are substantially accurate
and complete.
What does this mean and why would it apply to you? Maybe you had prior service, you went to medical school, and now you’re a senior LT who is in-zone for LCDR right away. Maybe you did a civilian NADDS residency and you are in-zone right away for LCDR. There might be other situations that would put you in this position, like getting time-in-grade credit for a PhD.
If you believe you are in this position, here is what I’d do:
- Confirm you are in-zone or above-zone. How can you do this? The easiest way is to either read the Promo Prep or get the FY20 lineal list. Or you can use this document from PERS.
- If you wish to be considered for promotion to LCDR, CDR, or CAPT, so what it says above. Send the letter simply requesting this. It can probably be a very short letter. There is no need to be verbose.
- Finally, contact PERS-802: Selection Board Eligibility Branch because I know people who did only #2 (sent a letter) and were not considered. Here’s what their website says:
If you have questions concerning promotion boards, eligibility for promotion boards, please contact the MyNavy Career Center at (833) 330-MNCC or askmncc@navy.mil.
PERS-802, Branch Head, (901) 874-4537
Officer Active and Reserve Eligibility Section
Section Supervisor (901) 874-3324
Also, here is a great article on this topic from the August 2018 Medical Corps Newsletter:
Virtual Promotion Board Pilot Conducted, Results Encouraging
MILLINGTON, Tenn. (NNS) — As part of Sailor 2025 personnel modernization and transformation efforts, a recent nuclear limited duty officer (LDO) board was conducted virtually, Navy leaders said Jan 31.
“The virtual board is an important improvement in the delivery of a modern, streamlined selection process for current and future naval leaders,” said Rear Adm. Rick Cheeseman, assistant commander, Navy Personnel Command for Career Management.
Charged by the chief of naval personnel to test the feasibility of conducting a virtual board, the NPC Submarine/Nuclear Officer Career Management Division (PERS-42) decided in July that the Fiscal Year 2020 Nuclear LDO In-Service Procurement Board conducted in November would be its target board for their test. The team spent that time developing solutions and creating procedures for the virtual board. This consisted of creating methods for existing software systems to work together, and creating redundancies and fail safes for each step of the process. Prior to the LDO board, five mock boards were conducted to assess their system.
“We wanted to get our virtual board as close as possible to the real thing,” said Cmdr. Carlos Martinez, head nuclear submarine executive officer detailer. “We provided each board member a redacted copy of the Sailors’ records they would be reviewing as well as a mark-up tool we developed based on (slide presentation) software.”
The team effort required the use of a variety of tools including the Defense Collaborative Services (DCS), secure file sharing services, encrypted email, as well as the software solutions created in-house by the PERS-42 staff.
“Protecting (Personally Identifiable Information) was a major concern in this process,” said Capt. Andrew Miller, deputy director, PERS-42. “In addition to the secure file sharing, we redacted names and other PII from the records and password protected each file. After the board members received their files, they were provided the passwords only for those records they would be reviewing.”
“The process was a little slower,” Miller said. “It was slower than our mock boards – one member had technical issues that slowed things down considerably; however, in the end we proved that the process is achievable.”
Although the PERS-42 team encountered some technical issues – for which they had backup processes in place – the entire board was conducted in a combined time of about 18 hours. In comparison, a conventional board entails a day of travel on the front and back end as well as the time it takes for the board itself. By conducting the board virtually, they also saved travel expenses for the nine board members.
“The financial savings is a good selling point,” Miller said, “but by conducting a board virtually, that’s one less board competing for physical space in the board spaces.”
Lessons learned from the pilot board reinforced many of the notions the team had going into the planning process. Currently, there are many challenges with using disparate systems, Miller said.
“We have a civilian information technology professional in our office – Walter Mathis – without whom none of this would have been possible,” Martinez said. “He’s the one who developed the software solutions, he wrote the code, created the markup tool, integrated the voting tool within DCS with other software systems, and more.”
A major takeaway, Miller said, is that to make virtual boards a permanent reality, a dedicated software suite would need to be created and operators trained.
“If we’re going to be serious about making this process a reality, we’re going to have to provide some resources to do it right,” Miller said. “We had full autonomy to make this happen. We would not have been able to get this done without it. Especially not in the timeframe within which we had to work.”
The PERS-42 team has debriefed the pilot board results and recommendations and has begun preparing for their next board.
“Every time you do this you learn something new,” Miller said. “We are looking at what can be done better. This time we tried to make the board as close to as possible to the ones conducted here physically, but with the virtual boards there may be better ways to conduct it. We’re looking for opportunities in the processes.”
Another virtual board is planned in the spring by PERS-42.
“Conducting boards virtually is just one of the many things we’re working on in this transformation effort, but it’s something that makes a lot of sense and will, in the long term, save everyone time and money. Our PERS-42 team has made great strides in making this a reality, and we’re looking forward to future virtual board pilots,” Cheeseman added.
Joel Schofer's Career Planning Blog 